A Bourdieusian analysis of qualitative authorship in entrepreneurship scholarship

Sarah Drakopoulou Dodd, Seonaidh McDonald, Gerard McElwee, Robert Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Empirically, this study builds on responses from leading qualitative entrepreneurship scholars.We carry out a Bourdieuan analysis of the field of entrepreneurship scholarship—particularly heterodox qualitative writing—and the way that scholars learn to play this game (habitus). It discusses unchallenged assumptions (doxa), commitment to shared stakes (illusio), the practice to achieve these stakes (practice), and the struggle for glories and riches (capital). By deploying Bourdieu’s frame, we have been able to expose key processes, structures, and relationships within qualitative entrepreneurship authorship. These offer four types of practical outcomes: guidance for good practice; insights into emotional aspects of authorship; warnings of potentially dysfunctional practices; and a celebration of our successes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)633–654
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Small Business Management
Volume52
Issue number4
Early online date15 Aug 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 31 Oct 2014

Keywords

  • entrepreneurship
  • Bourdieu
  • qualitative analysis
  • heterodox qualitative writing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Bourdieusian analysis of qualitative authorship in entrepreneurship scholarship'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this