A atuação do jornalismo editorial no escândalo JBS: uma análise comparativa sobre os jornais Folha de S. Paulo e O Estado de S. Paulo

Translated title of the contribution: Editorial journalism and the JBS scandal in Brazil: a comparative study of Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo editorials

Francisco Paulo Jamil Marques, Deivison Henrique de F. Santos, Camila Mont'Alverne, Paulo Ferracioli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This article examines the editorial positions held by two mainstream Brazilian newspapers -Folha de S. PauloandO Estado de S. Paulo- regarding the scandal involving the former president, Michel Temer and the businessman, Joesley Batista. We examine 103 editorials published between May and September 2017. The period begins the day after the scandal arose to the end of the term of the then Attorney General, Rodrigo Janot. Quantitative and qualitative content analysis indicates differences in how the two newspapers addressed the scandal: while FSP insisted on distrusting Temer’s behavior, OESP criticized the Federal Public Prosecutor’s Office. Both news outlets, however, agreed that the economic agenda had to be protected. This conclusion demonstrates the relevance of editorials for characterizing newspaper companies as players in the political game.
Translated title of the contributionEditorial journalism and the JBS scandal in Brazil: a comparative study of Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo editorials
Original languagePortuguese
Article numbere226562
Number of pages39
JournalRevista Brasileira de Ciência Política
Volume33
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Nov 2020

Keywords

  • editorial journalism
  • political journalism
  • editorials
  • Michel Temer
  • political scandals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Editorial journalism and the JBS scandal in Brazil: a comparative study of Folha de S. Paulo and O Estado de S. Paulo editorials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this