Data for: "Perceptions of Emotional Functionality: Similarities and Differences Among Dignity, Face, and Honor Cultures"

  • Angela T. Maitner (Creator)
  • Jamie DeCoster (Creator)
  • Per A. Andersson (Creator)
  • Kimmo Eriksson (Creator)
  • Sara Sherbaji (Creator)
  • Roger Giner-Sorolla (Creator)
  • Diane M. Mackie (Creator)
  • Mark Aveyard (Creator)
  • Heather M. Claypool (Creator)
  • Richard J. Crisp (Creator)
  • Vladimir Gritskov (Creator)
  • Kristina Habjan (Creator)
  • Andree Hartanto (Creator)
  • Toko Kiyonari (Creator)
  • Anna O. Kuzminska (Creator)
  • Zoi Manesi (Creator)
  • Catherine Molho (Creator)
  • Anudhi Munasinghe (Creator)
  • Leonard S. Peperkoorn (Creator)
  • Victor Kenji Medeiros Shiramizu (Creator)
  • Rachel Smallman (Creator)
  • Natalia Soboleva (Creator)
  • Adam W. Stivers (Creator)
  • Amy Summerville (Creator)
  • Baopei Wu (Creator)
  • Junhui Wu (Creator)



Emotions are linked to wide sets of action tendencies, and it can be difficult to predict which specific action tendency will be motivated or indulged in response to individual experiences of emotion. Building on a functional perspective of emotion, we investigate whether anger and shame connect to different behavioral intentions in dignity, face, and honor cultures. Using simple animations that showed perpetrators taking resources from victims, we conducted two studies across eleven countries investigating the extent to which participants expected victims to feel anger and shame, how they thought victims should respond to such violations, and how expectations of emotions were affected by enacted behavior. Across cultures, anger was associated with desires to reclaim resources or alert others to the violation. In face and honor cultures, but not dignity cultures, shame was associated with the desire for aggressive retaliation. However, we found that when victims indulged motivationally-relevant behavior, expected anger and shame were reduced, and satisfaction increased, in similar ways across cultures. Results suggest similarities and differences in expectations of how emotions functionally elicit behavioral responses across cultures.

This site includes records provided by Elsevier's Data Monitor product. University of Strathclyde does not control or guarantee the accuracy, relevance, or completeness of the information contained in such records and accepts no responsibility or liability for such information.
Date made available3 May 2023
Date of data production2022

Cite this